- Activity Chart
Apparently the design concerns was fixed while the implementation try lower than review. Should the RFC end up being booked to possess dialogue in the TechCom?
Evidently the shape inquiries are solved therefore the execution is around comment. If the RFC getting planned for conversation from the TechCom?
- The newest proposal regarding the task description is quite unlike what could have been adopted. Because of it to advance because the an RFC, the job description must be updated so you’re able to mirror that which we happen to be thinking about.
- We do not know if that is suggested purely due to the fact a 3rd cluster feature, and deployment to the WMF possibilities. In case it is for only 3rd activities, it might not actually you desire a keen RFC, and can even maybe be done once the an expansion too. When it is for WMF creation, we will see to appear very closely into implications to possess caching and results.
It seems that the proper execution concerns is actually fixed and the execution are below feedback. Should the RFC feel scheduled to own talk at TechCom?
- The fresh new suggestion about activity breakdown is quite distinctive from what has been accompanied. For it to progress as the an RFC, work malfunction has to be updated to help you mirror that which we are generally deciding on.
- We don’t know if that is recommended strictly as a third group element, or for deployment for the WMF systems. When it is for 3rd activities, it may not even you need an RFC, and may even perhaps be performed due to the fact an extension also. When it is getting WMF creation, we will have to look carefully with the ramifications to have caching and results.
W.r.t. #step one – The proper execution keeps indeed come a long way even as we performs which have on part point a hier zijn de bevindingen great deal more practical and easy to use. We can up-date the fresh malfunction with the RFC. #2 – Does “implementation on the WMF possibilities” mean and also make so it section of MediaWiki key application? I believe it’s for ages been new expectation, that’s the reason it has been through of many iterations regarding design, i18n and you may perf update 🙂 You will WMF relatives chime in to establish this really is nonetheless the brand new situation?
#dos – Do “implementation to your WMF assistance” imply and make that it element of MediaWiki core application? I think it has been the brand new assumption, that’s the reason it offers undergone of several iterations regarding construction, i18n and you can perf upgrade 🙂 You are going to WMF nearest and dearest chime in to prove this might be nonetheless the brand new instance?
It indicates helping they into at least some of the WMF internet. Whether it is section of center or an expansion is not very relevant. The first RFC might have been recorded on the notion of having which enabled for the Wikipedia and you may loved ones, but Let me have direct word on that on the related WMF folks.
- We don’t know if this can be suggested purely as a third people feature, or even for implementation on WMF expertise. If it is just for third parties, it may not actually you desire a keen RFC, and may perhaps be done as an extension as well. If it’s getting WMF production, we will see to look very closely into the ramifications to possess caching and abilities.